Dragons’ Den investments perform worse than normal start-ups, research shows

Dragons' Den investments perform worse than normal start-ups, research shows

Since 2005 the multi-millionaire panelists of Dragons’ Den have been regarded by many as the epitome of shrewd deal-making.

But a new analysis which compares the performance of successful contestants on the show against a random sample of start-ups appears to call into question the Dragons business nous.

In fact, the research suggests that entrepreneurs who secure investment from the likes of Deborah Meaden and Peter Jones tend to perform worse than equivalent sized businesses which manage to raise finance elsewhere.

Published yesterday, the new figures from the investment platform Syndicate Room may help future contestants relax as they pitch their business plans to the Dragons, an experience…

Source link